Healthcare CRA Audits: Why Practices Get Selected and What Happens Next
What draws the CRA to a medical, dental or clinic practice, the HST and shareholder loan errors that account for most assessments, what an auditor asks for, how revenue is verified against OHIP and third-party records, and how to respond so the scope does not widen. Written by a licensed Canadian CPA.
Healthcare practices are audited because they are high-income, their revenue is independently verifiable against OHIP and third-party payer records, and they share a small number of predictable errors: input tax credits claimed against exempt revenue, shareholder loans that never clear, family salaries that cannot be supported, and personal costs in the practice. Most assessments trace back to treatment that was wrong from the start, not to a judgment call that went badly.
Why Practices Get Selected
A medical or dental practice is an attractive audit target for reasons that have nothing to do with the practitioner's honesty. The income is high, so an adjustment is worth making. The revenue is independently verifiable, because OHIP and third-party payers already report what they paid you. And the corporate and personal returns are tightly linked, so one thread pulls several.
Selection is largely comparative. The CRA knows what expense ratios look like across a specialty, and a practice sitting well outside that range invites a question. So does a large shareholder loan, a sudden change year over year, family members on payroll, or HST claimed by a practice whose revenue is mostly exempt. For the wider picture please see our healthcare CPA services.
The Errors That Account for Most Assessments
| Issue | What Goes Wrong | Why It Is Found |
|---|---|---|
| Input tax credits on exempt revenue | HST recovered on costs of an exempt practice | Registration and exempt billings are both visible to the CRA |
| Mixed practice apportionment | Full ITCs claimed where only part of the revenue is taxable | The taxable and exempt split does not support the claim |
| Shareholder loans | Draws accumulate, balance never cleared in time | It sits on the balance sheet in plain view |
| Family salaries | Pay well above market for minimal or undocumented work | No records of hours, duties or a comparable rate |
| Personal expenses | Vehicle, travel, meals and home costs run through the practice | Implausible percentages and statements that do not match |
| Revenue against remittances | Reported revenue below what OHIP records show | The CRA holds the third-party figure already |
| Associate arrangements | Independent contractor in name, employee in substance | The paperwork does not match how the clinic runs |
| Conference and travel | Professional purpose attached to a personal trip | Destination, duration and dates tell the story |
The HST Trap, and It Is the Big One
Most core healthcare services are exempt. That means you charge no HST on them, and you generally cannot recover the HST you pay on your costs. The instinct to register and claim input tax credits, which is correct for almost every other business, is precisely wrong for an exempt practice, and it produces one of the cleanest assessments the CRA can raise.
The harder cases are mixed practices. A dental practice with cosmetic work and retail products, a clinic renting rooms to other practitioners, a physician providing administrative services or third-party medical reports: each has taxable revenue alongside exempt revenue, and the input tax credits must be apportioned accordingly. That apportionment is where practices get it wrong, in both directions. Please see our HST exempt healthcare services guide.
Shareholder Loans: The Slow Accumulation
Money that leaves the corporation and is neither salary nor dividend has to be somewhere, and it is usually a shareholder loan. Practitioners draw what they need through the year, the balance grows quietly, and nobody treats it as urgent because no cash changed hands at year end.
It becomes urgent when the loan is not repaid within the required timeframe, at which point the amount can be included in personal income, and the practitioner discovers that money already spent is now taxable. The balance sits on the balance sheet where any auditor can see it. It is one of the most avoidable findings in professional practice work, and it is almost always a bookkeeping and planning failure rather than an aggressive position.
How Revenue Gets Verified
This is the part practitioners underestimate. The CRA does not need to reconstruct your billings from your books, because for physicians and many practitioners the payer already reports what was paid. OHIP remittances and third-party payer records give an independent revenue figure before your return is even opened.
Timing differences between remittance and recognition are normal and explainable. An unexplained gap is a different matter, because it stops being a question about one figure and becomes a question about whether the ledger can be relied on at all. Once that question is live, the scope tends to expand.
Review or Audit, and Why the First Letter Matters
| Factor | Review | Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | One item, often one year | The books themselves, potentially several years |
| Typical trigger | A specific figure looks unusual | A review answered poorly, or a pattern across years |
| What is requested | Support for the item queried | Ledger, statements, payroll, minute book, loan detail |
| How it usually ends | Closed on documentation | Assessment, sometimes across linked personal returns |
| Where it goes wrong | Answering more than was asked | Records that were never maintained properly |
A great many audits began as reviews that were answered badly. Auditors ask open questions, and practitioners answer them helpfully and at length, because that is how a clinician handles a question. The instinct that serves you with patients works against you here. Answer the question asked, with the documents that support it, and nothing further.
What to Do When the Letter Arrives
- Read the deadline first. The dates in CRA correspondence are strict, and options that exist this week disappear next month.
- Do not respond off the cuff. A quick reply feels cooperative and frequently widens the scope. Nothing should go back before you know what is actually being asked and what it implies.
- Work out what it is really about. A question about one expense is sometimes a question about one expense. Sometimes it is a probe. The difference determines the response.
- Have a CPA manage the correspondence. Not because you have something to hide, but because scope control is a skill. See our audit support and representation.
If the Assessment Is Wrong
An assessment is not the end of the process. You can object formally, and the objection is considered by a different part of the CRA than the one that assessed you, which matters more than it sounds. Deadlines are strict and missing them is costly. Gross negligence penalties in particular are worth challenging where they have been applied to what was genuinely an error, because the threshold for them is higher than mere mistake. Please see our objections and appeals service.
Fixing It Before They Find It
Where a return contained an error or an omission, the position is materially better if you raise it than if they do. The Voluntary Disclosures Program may allow correction with relief that stops being available the moment the CRA makes contact. Timing is the entire point, and practitioners who suspect a problem and wait to see whether it surfaces generally make the outcome worse. Please see our voluntary disclosures and past account clean-up services.
Most audit findings are set up years earlier. The ITC claimed on an exempt practice, the shareholder loan nobody cleared, the spouse's salary with no record of the work: none of these is a judgment call that went against the practitioner. Each is treatment that was wrong from the day it started and simply had not been looked at yet.
Case Study: Dental Practice, Ontario
A dental corporation came to us with a CRA letter querying its input tax credits. The practice had registered for HST and been claiming full ITCs on all of its costs, when the substantial majority of its revenue was exempt clinical work and only the cosmetic and retail side was taxable. Alongside it sat a shareholder loan that had grown across three years of drawings, and a spouse on payroll with no record of duties or hours. We apportioned the ITCs correctly across the exempt and taxable revenue, restated the affected periods, quantified the shareholder loan exposure and structured its repayment before it could be included in income, and documented the spouse's actual administrative role and a defensible rate. We handled the correspondence throughout, and the file closed on the item queried without expanding into the years and the personal return that were plainly at risk. The figures here are illustrative of the work we do, not a specific client file.
Received a CRA Letter About Your Practice?
We tell you what it actually means, handle the correspondence, and keep the file to the question asked. Exact flat fee quoted upfront. All fees include HST.
Book Free ConsultationFrequently Asked Questions: Healthcare CRA Audits
What Our Clients Say
1300+ five-star reviews from healthcare professionals and business owners across Ontario and Canada.
Audit-Ready Practices Do Not Get Bad Outcomes.
We get the HST treatment right for exempt and mixed practices, keep shareholder loans from becoming income, document family compensation properly, reconcile your revenue to your remittances, and handle the CRA correspondence if it comes. Exact flat fee quoted upfront. All fees include HST.
