Book Consultation

Gondaliya CPA

Section 67  ·  Outside TOSI  ·  Free Calculator

Paying Family Members From Your Corporation

A reasonable salary for work actually done is outside TOSI entirely, which makes it the last straightforward income splitting tool left. Work out the defensible range, the household saving and the payroll cost that eats into it.

Reasonable range
Household tax saved
Full payroll cost
Documentation needed

Step 1 — Who and What They Do

Spouse

Spouse
Adult child, 18 or over
Child under 18
Parent

The rules are the same, the scrutiny differs


Honestly. This is the number that decides it.

Bookkeeping and admin

General labour or cleaning
Bookkeeping and admin
Skilled trade or technical
Management or business development

Sets the market rate for the work

Step 2 — The Numbers

What you are thinking of paying them


A job elsewhere, pension, rental


Active business income

Step 3 — Employer Costs

No, non-arm’s length

No, non-arm’s length
Yes, insurable

Related employment is often not insurable

No, under the exemption

No, under the exemption
Yes, payroll over the exemption

Exemption covers most small employers


Percent of payroll, zero if not covered

Net Family Benefit


net benefit

Defensible Range

Household Tax Saved

Employer Payroll Cost

Net Benefit

Is the Wage Reasonable?

ItemBasisAmount

The Household Saving

ItemBasisAmount

Employer Costs That Eat Into It

CostRateAmount

Documentation You Need

ItemWhy It Matters

Points That Decide This

    What to Do Next

    Disclaimer: Section 67 of the Income Tax Act limits the deduction of an outlay or expense to a reasonable amount, and the CRA applies this to salaries paid to family members by asking whether an arm’s length employer would have paid the same amount for the same work. Where a wage is found unreasonable the excess is denied as a corporate deduction while remaining taxable in the recipient’s hands, producing double taxation on the excess. A salary is required to be for services actually rendered. The tax on split income rules in section 120.4 apply to dividends and certain other amounts and do not apply to salary or wages, so a reasonable salary for work performed is outside TOSI. Employment income paid to a family member is subject to CPP where the employee is between 18 and 70, at 5.95% on pensionable earnings between the $3,500 basic exemption and the $74,600 YMPE for 2026, to a maximum of $4,230.45 each for employee and employer, plus CPP2 at 4% on earnings between the YMPE and the $85,000 YAMPE to a maximum of $416.00 each. Employment between related persons is generally not insurable for EI purposes under paragraph 5(2)(i) of the Employment Insurance Act unless the Minister is satisfied under paragraph 5(3)(b) that a substantially similar contract would have been entered into at arm’s length, so the EI position should be confirmed rather than assumed and a CPT1 ruling can be requested. The Ontario employer health tax applies at rates up to 1.95% on Ontario remuneration, with an exemption available to eligible private-sector employers whose annual Ontario payroll is below the exemption threshold. WSIB coverage and premium rates depend on the industry classification. Corporate tax is applied at the Ontario combined rate of 12.2% on active business income within the $500,000 small business limit. Personal tax is estimated using indicative Ontario combined marginal rates. This page is general information, not tax advice.

    Salary Is Outside TOSI, and That Is the Whole Point

    The tax on split income rules gutted dividend splitting with family members. They apply to dividends and certain other amounts. They do not apply to salary and wages.

    So a reasonable salary paid for work actually done is the last straightforward income splitting tool available to an owner-managed corporation. It is not a loophole, it is simply how employment income has always worked.

    MethodTOSI Applies?Requires
    Dividends to a family memberYes, unless an exclusion appliesAn excluded amount test
    Salary for work performedNoThe work to be real and the wage reasonable

    The trade is that salary has to be earned and dividends do not. Dividends need only share ownership. A salary needs someone to actually do work, at hours you could describe to an auditor, for a wage a stranger would have been paid. That is a real constraint and it is also entirely satisfiable.

    The Test Is What a Stranger Would Have Been Paid

    Section 67 limits a deduction to a reasonable amount. Applied to family wages, the question is whether an arm’s length employer would have paid the same for the same work.

    That breaks into two things and both have to hold. The hours must be real, and the hourly rate must be market. Twelve hours a week of bookkeeping at a market rate is defensible. Twelve hours a week at two hundred dollars an hour is not, and neither is a market rate for hours nobody worked.

    RoleIndicative Market Rate
    General labour or cleaning$18 to $24 an hour
    Bookkeeping and admin$25 to $38 an hour
    Skilled trade or technical$35 to $55 an hour
    Management or business development$45 to $85 an hour

    An unreasonable wage is taxed twice. The excess is denied as a corporate deduction and stays taxable in the recipient’s hands. That is the worst outcome available and it is why the number should be defensible from the start rather than argued about later.

    The Saving Comes From the Rate Gap

    Moving income from a high-rate earner to a family member with little or no other income captures the difference between the two marginal rates, plus the family member’s own personal credits.

    A family member with no other income pays nothing on the first slice of a wage because of the basic personal amount. That first tranche is the most valuable and the benefit falls away as their income rises.

    • The first slice is sheltered by their basic personal amount
    • The next tranche is taxed at the lowest bracket while you are at the top
    • Their existing income matters, since a family member already earning well saves little
    • RRSP room is created for them, which dividends never do
    • CPP contributions begin, building their own entitlement

    Payroll Costs Eat Into It, So Run the Net

    The gross saving is not the answer. Employer CPP alone is five point nine five percent on pensionable earnings, and there may be EHT and WSIB on top.

    On a thirty-five thousand dollar wage, employer CPP is close to nineteen hundred dollars. That is a real cost and it comes straight off the saving, which is why a wage that looks worthwhile on the gross number sometimes is not on the net.

    Employer CPP is not purely a cost. It is buying the family member CPP entitlement, and the employee half is creditable against their own tax. Treating it as pure waste overstates the drag, particularly for a spouse with no other pension.

    EI Usually Does Not Apply, and Should Be Confirmed

    Employment between related persons is generally not insurable, so no EI premiums are payable by either side. That is a saving and it also means no EI entitlement.

    The exception is where the Minister is satisfied a substantially similar arrangement would have been made at arm’s length. Because it is a determination rather than a bright line, the position is worth confirming with a CPT1 ruling where the amounts are significant, rather than assuming either way and finding out at a payroll examination.

    Paying a Minor Child Is Held to the Same Standard

    There is no rule preventing it and the reasonableness test applies exactly as it does to anyone else. A teenager who genuinely does filing, cleaning or deliveries can be paid for it.

    What draws attention is a wage that could not plausibly have been earned. Full-time hours during school term, or a salary well beyond what the work is worth, invites a question that is difficult to answer. Keep it modest, keep it real, and keep the timesheet.

    Documentation Is the Whole Defence

    The tax treatment rests on being able to show the work happened. Without that, the wage is just money moved between family members and it will be treated that way.

    1. A written job description setting out duties and expected hours
    2. Timesheets or a log kept during the year rather than reconstructed after
    3. Payment by regular payroll into their own bank account, not cash and not a transfer at year end
    4. Source deductions remitted on the normal schedule
    5. A T4 issued by the last day of February
    6. Evidence of the market rate, such as a job posting for comparable work

    One lump sum paid at year end with no timesheets is the pattern that gets reassessed. A regular payroll through the year costs nothing extra to run and is the difference between a defensible position and an indefensible one.

    What This Calculator Does Not Cover

    • The EI insurability determination, which may need a CPT1 ruling
    • WSIB classification and whether coverage is required
    • Their personal credits in detail, beyond the basic personal amount
    • Employment standards obligations to a family employee
    • Paying a family member through a dividend, where TOSI applies instead
    • Provinces other than Ontario

    Set the wage before the year starts, not at year end. Our payroll service covers the setup, the remittances, the T4s and the documentation that supports the deduction.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions on paying family from a corporation.

    Can I pay my spouse a salary from my corporation?
    Yes, for work actually performed at a reasonable amount. Section 67 limits the deduction to what an arm’s length employer would have paid for the same work, so the hours must be real and the rate must be market. Both have to hold.

    Does TOSI apply to salary paid to family?
    No. The tax on split income rules apply to dividends and certain other amounts, not to salary and wages. A reasonable salary for work performed sits outside TOSI entirely, which is why it is the last straightforward income splitting tool available.

    What happens if the CRA says the wage is unreasonable?
    The excess is denied as a corporate deduction and remains taxable in the recipient’s hands, so the same money is taxed twice. That is the worst available outcome, which is why the figure should be defensible from the start rather than argued about at an audit.

    Do I have to pay EI on a family member?
    Usually not. Employment between related persons is generally not insurable, so no premiums are payable and no entitlement arises. The exception is where the Minister is satisfied a similar arrangement would have been made at arm’s length, so it is worth confirming with a CPT1 ruling rather than assuming.

    Do I have to pay CPP?
    Yes, where they are between 18 and 70. For 2026 that is 5.95% each for employee and employer on pensionable earnings between the $3,500 exemption and the $74,600 ceiling, to a maximum of $4,230.45 each. It is a real cost and it also buys them CPP entitlement.

    Can I hire my child under 18?
    Yes, and the same reasonableness test applies. A teenager doing filing, cleaning or deliveries can be paid for it. What draws attention is a wage that could not plausibly have been earned, such as full-time hours during school term.

    Can I just pay them a lump sum at year end?
    You can, and it is the pattern that gets reassessed. A single year-end payment with no timesheets looks like money moved between family members rather than a wage. Regular payroll through the year costs nothing extra to run and is the difference between defensible and not.

    What documentation do I need?
    A written job description with duties and hours, timesheets kept during the year rather than reconstructed, payment by regular payroll into their own account, source deductions remitted on schedule, a T4 by the last day of February, and some evidence of the market rate such as a comparable job posting.

    Set the Wage Before the Year Starts

    Tell us who does what and for how many hours. We will set a defensible figure, put them on regular payroll, handle the remittances and the T4, and keep the documentation that supports the deduction.

    Registered CPA Ontario — Firm ID 61330051
    Dual CPA Canada and USA
    1300+ Five-Star Reviews
    Fixed Fee, Including HST


    Scroll to Top