Tax Accountant for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties in Ontario and Across Canada
One condominium in Florida, one tenant, one set of bank statements, and two tax returns that will never agree with each other. That is not a bookkeeping failure, it is built into the two systems. On the United States side, residential rental property placed in service after 1986 is depreciated under MACRS and the straight-line method must be used, with 27.5 years being the general depreciation system recovery period for residential rental property. It is not something you opt into each spring depending on whether the rent was any good. On the Canadian side, capital cost allowance is claimed at your option up to a maximum, a Class 1 building runs at 4% on a declining-balance basis, and subsection 1100(11) of the Income Tax Regulations will not let capital cost allowance create or increase a loss from your rental properties taken together. So one return writes the building down every single year and the other one frequently cannot write it down at all. The two cost figures move apart, and they keep moving apart for as long as you hold the property. US depreciation reduces basis and therefore increases the gain on a sale, while the Canadian cost base has been travelling an entirely different road. We build both cost histories and hold them, prepare the United States filing and the Canadian return as one exercise, obtain the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, put Form W-8ECI into the right hands, and run the Form 8288-B withholding certificate when the property sells — with AFFORDABLE flat fees.
AFFORDABLE US Rental Property Tax Accountant
Two returns, one building, and nothing anywhere that obliges them to match. The Internal Revenue Service taxes the income from property situated in the United States because the property is there. The Canada Revenue Agency taxes the same profit because you live here. Neither authority adjusts its own cost figures to suit the other, and the depreciation rules they apply to that one building are not merely different in rate — they are different in kind. One of them treats the write-down as a feature of the return. The other treats it as a choice and then puts a ceiling and a restriction on the choice. A file that does not carry both histories separately will one day be unable to answer the only question a sale really asks, which is what the building cost according to each country.
The owners we act for are not property companies. They are a retired couple with a Fort Myers condominium let by the week through a booking platform, an engineer with an Arizona single-family rental and a local manager collecting the rent, a family holding a Myrtle Beach unit jointly with a sibling. The size of the holding changes very little. What changes the work is how many years have already gone by with a United States return prepared by somebody who never saw the Canadian one, or a Canadian return prepared by somebody who never saw the United States schedule.
You own the property. We will hold both cost bases, both returns, and the forms that sit between them.
Our Official Partners
Accounting That Understands How a US Rental Property Actually Works
Nothing else on a Canadian personal return behaves quite like this. Every other asset you own has one cost base. This one has two, maintained under two sets of rules by two authorities that do not consult one another, in two currencies, and the distance between them widens with every year the property is held. Books kept for one country cannot tell you where you stand in the other.
Stay Compliant and Minimize Your US Rental Property Tax
On this file keeping compliant and keeping the cost down are one exercise, because nearly every saving available to you rests on a document somebody has to keep in the year it arises. The land-and-building allocation, the closing statement, the two depreciation schedules and the evidence of United States tax paid are all cheap to assemble now and painfully expensive to reconstruct eleven years later in the month a buyer appears.
Accounting & Tax Experts for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
- AFFORDABLE + Fully Registered CPA Firm
- Business and Corporate Tax Expert
- Small & Medium Business Expert
- Accounting, bookkeeping, and tax filing
- Certified CPA
- 1450+ 5-star Google reviews
- 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
- 60-Day Fees Matching Policy
Why Choose Our Accounting Services for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties?
Tax Planning — The Schedules Before the Sale
Both depreciation histories are built from the closing statement in the first year and carried forward every year after it, so the figures a disposition needs are already on file instead of being pieced together from memory.
Consulting — One Property or Two
The capital cost allowance restriction is measured across your rental properties together, so buying a second one changes what is available on the first. We model that before you buy rather than after the year is filed.
CRA Representation — Rent That Never Reached a Return
Where United States rental income never appeared in Canada, we establish the years, rebuild both schedules, and come forward on Form RC199 instead of waiting to be found.
Bookkeeping — In Two Currencies
Rent, mortgage interest, property tax, insurance, homeowners association dues and management fees captured in United States dollars and converted on a stated basis, with the working kept where a reviewer can see it.
Google Reviews
US Rental Property Clients
US Rental Property Tax and Accounting Services in Ontario
Personal Tax Filing for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
The Canadian return and the United States filing prepared in one engagement from one ledger, so the same rent is not described two different ways.
Bookkeeping & Accounting for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Rent and costs captured in United States dollars and converted on a stated basis, with two asset registers running in parallel on one building.
Payroll Services for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Canadian payroll where the property genuinely gives rise to it, and a plain answer where the duty is a United States one instead.
GST/HST Filing for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Rent from property situated in the United States is not a supply made here, and we keep it out of a threshold it never belonged in.
Tax Planning for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Both depreciation histories carried forward each year, and the capital cost allowance decision taken deliberately instead of by default.
Catch-Up Tax Filing for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Unfiled years rebuilt oldest first with both cost bases reconstructed, and cancellation of penalties and interest requested on Form RC4288.
CRA Review Representation for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
A query about United States rent answered with the United States return, the management statements and the evidence of tax paid.
CPA Rental Statements for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Figures a Canadian lender will accept, in both currencies, with depreciation and capital cost allowance shown as two separate lines.
Incorporation Review for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
The Canadian consequences of holding personally, through a company or through a United States limited liability company, without pretending the choice is ours.
Catch-Up Bookkeeping Services for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Years of management statements, platform payouts and bank records rebuilt until one ledger can support both countries’ returns.
Cross-Border Return Coordination for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
The Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, Form W-8ECI, and the Form 8288-B withholding certificate when the property is sold.
Voluntary Disclosure Program for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Come forward on United States rental income that never reached a Canadian return, on Form RC199, before the Agency makes contact.
Accounting & Tax Services Tailored for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Twelve services, written for a Canadian resident who owns one or two residential rental properties in the United States and has to satisfy two tax authorities that do not share a cost base.
- Your Canadian return brings in the rent from the United States property as income from property, in Canadian dollars, converted on a basis we state and keep, because the rate somebody used is the first thing anyone queries years later.
- The United States filing is prepared from that same ledger rather than from a second one, so the rent, the operating costs and the depreciation shown on the two returns trace back to a single set of source documents.
- Relief in Canada for the United States tax you actually paid is claimed on your return, and the computation behind it is scoped as work of its own, because it is a calculation and not a line anybody can fill in by eye.
- Both returns leave a paper trail, retained to answer the six-year requirement set by section 230 of the Income Tax Act, while the two depreciation schedules are kept permanently, because a sale reaches back a good deal further.
- Where a year went unfiled on either side of the border, an assessment may be raised under subsection 152(7) from information the Agency already has, which is worth knowing before a letter lands rather than after one does.
- Rent collected, mortgage interest paid to the United States lender, property tax, insurance, homeowners association dues, management fees and repairs are all captured in United States dollars first and converted afterwards, never the reverse.
- The land-and-building allocation taken from the closing statement is recorded once and then used by both countries for as long as you hold the property, since land is depreciated by neither of them and a careless split is wrong twice.
- Two fixed-asset registers run side by side on the same building, one feeding the United States schedule and one feeding the Canadian capital cost allowance schedule, with appliances and furnishings tracked apart from the structure in each.
- Closing costs on the acquisition are allocated while the file is being opened rather than at disposition, because the paperwork that explains them is to hand now and will be very hard indeed to locate in a decade.
- Where your records sit in QuickBooks Online, Xero, Stessa, AppFolio or Buildium we work inside them, with Dext or Hubdoc carrying the United States invoices and monthly management statements across to us.
- Most owners pay a management company and have no payroll at all. We say that plainly rather than selling a service the file does not need, or one that belongs to a jurisdiction we do not practise in.
- Where you employ somebody in Canada in connection with the property, the Canadian payroll account, the remittance calendar and the February information return are opened and run here in the ordinary way.
- Where you pay a person directly at the United States property, the employment and withholding duties are fixed by United States federal and state law, and we tell you it is a United States engagement rather than reason about it from Ontario.
- Fees paid to a United States property manager are an expense of earning the rent and are recorded as one, with the management statements kept, because those statements are also the only record of what rent was actually collected.
- The Canadian side of those records stays on file for six years, as section 230 of the Income Tax Act requires, and the United States management statements are kept beside them so one request produces one bundle.
- Rent from a property situated in the United States is not a supply made in Canada, so the ordinary position is that your United States rental revenue does not enter a Canadian sales tax calculation at all.
- That is worth stating because it is the question owners ask most, and the commonest thing we are asked to unwind is somebody who registered on the strength of gross receipts that never belonged in a threshold.
- Should you carry on some separate activity in Canada, sales tax becomes a question about that activity: 13% is the Ontario rate on a taxable supply made here, and the small-supplier test looks at $30,000 of taxable supplies over four consecutive calendar quarters.
- If you are already registered for something unrelated, we keep the two engagements apart, so the United States rental does not quietly drift into returns in which it has no business appearing.
- Any sales or lodging tax a United States state or municipality charges on a short-term letting is decided where the property sits, and we say so instead of reasoning about another country’s charge from here.
- Planning on this file is schedule work rather than rate work. Both depreciation histories are built in year one and carried forward, so the figures a disposition needs exist long before any buyer is at the table.
- Whether to claim capital cost allowance in Canada is a live decision in every single year, because subsection 1100(11) of the Income Tax Regulations will not let it create or increase a loss from your rental properties taken together.
- Buying a second United States property changes the first one’s position, since that restriction is measured across all of your rental properties rather than property by property. We work it through before you commit.
- The net-rental-income election that decides whether the United States taxes this rent on profit rather than on gross is described on our cross-border tax planning page, and we point you there instead of restating it.
- United States estate tax exposure on United States real estate held by a Canadian, and the treaty’s prorated unified credit, are handled on that same page, because the structuring question is far wider than one rental unit.
- The earliest open year is prepared first, because both countries run interest from that year’s own due date, and a later year built out of sequence generally has to be built a second time.
- Both depreciation schedules are reconstructed from the closing statement and whatever years were filed, so the rebuilt returns carry cost figures that can be reconciled rather than figures that merely look about right.
- Where a United States return went in and a Canadian one did not, the Canadian years are built by restating the United States figures under Canadian rules rather than copying them, since the two do not agree by design.
- Form RC4288 asks the Canada Revenue Agency to cancel penalties and interest where what went wrong was outside your control, and it is a request made separately from the filings it travels with.
- Where nothing whatever has been reported here, the Voluntary Disclosures Program is usually the better door, carried on Form RC199, and we decide which of the two routes applies before a single page is submitted.
- A query about United States rental income is answered with the United States return, the monthly management statements and the evidence of tax paid, all assembled before one line of a reply is drafted.
- Where the Canada Revenue Agency questions a cost base, the answer is the schedule itself: the closing statement, the land-and-building allocation, and the year-by-year position including every year in which nothing was claimed.
- A difference between your two returns is normal, and we say so in those words, setting out each country’s depreciation rule, rather than treating the gap as something that has to be apologised for.
- An assessment can also simply be wrong. The reply is then a notice of objection, lodged inside the statutory period and argued from the schedules and statements that are already sitting in the file.
- A letter from the Internal Revenue Service or a state revenue department is a different engagement under different rules, and we tell you which of the two a piece of correspondence belongs to before anyone replies.
- Where a Canadian bank or lender wants figures for the United States property, we prepare the compilation engagement report so the rent, the operating costs and the mortgage all appear on one readable statement.
- Amounts are shown in Canadian dollars with the conversion basis disclosed, and in United States dollars beside them, because a reader comparing the statement to a United States mortgage document needs both columns.
- Depreciation taken on the United States return and capital cost allowance claimed in Canada appear as two lines rather than one, since they are different amounts arrived at under rules that have nothing to do with each other.
- Where the property is held jointly, each owner’s share is stated, so that a lender is not left dividing a combined figure and arriving at a number nobody in the file would recognise.
- A statement of this kind is a compilation and says so on its face. It is neither an audit nor a review, and we make that clear to a lender in advance rather than once they have relied on it.
- Holding United States real estate personally, through a company, or through a United States limited liability company are three different positions, and the differences are legal and United States-side before they are ever Canadian.
- We will set out the Canadian consequences of each one: how the rent is taxed here, what happens on a disposition, and what the Canada Revenue Agency does with income from an entity the two countries characterise differently.
- We will not tell you which to choose. That decision carries United States tax, United States state law and liability components belonging to United States counsel, and we say so plainly instead of implying a competence we lack.
- Our Canadian corporation and United States limited liability company double-tax calculator works through the arithmetic of one of those positions, and it is the sensible place to begin on the numbers.
- Where you decide to incorporate in Canada for reasons of your own, we handle the registration and its accounts, and we keep that work separate from the question of where the property itself should sit.
- Years of management statements, mortgage interest and bank records are rebuilt in United States dollars first, period by period, and converted afterwards on a basis written into the file rather than carried in somebody’s head.
- The closing statement is tracked down before anything else, because without it the land-and-building allocation has to be estimated, and every depreciation figure in both countries then rests on that estimate.
- Capital expenditure that was posted as an operating cost is identified and moved across into the asset registers, since it belongs in the cost base rather than in one year’s expenses in either country.
- Where the unit was let through a booking platform, the platform statements are reconciled to the deposits actually received, because gross bookings and net payouts are two different numbers and only one of them is your rent.
- By the end of the rebuild a single ledger supports two returns, which is the condition both countries’ filings have to be prepared from before anything at all is submitted anywhere.
- The United States return and the Canadian return are prepared by the same people inside one engagement, so an amount described one way on the first of them is not described differently on the second.
- The Individual Taxpayer Identification Number is applied for as the opening step where you do not already hold one, with the identity documents the Internal Revenue Service requires, and it is started well ahead of any deadline.
- Form W-8ECI is prepared and placed with the tenant or the property manager, so the person paying you holds the certificate explaining how this rental income is being reported instead of guessing at the right treatment.
- On a sale we run the Form 8288-B withholding certificate application well before closing, because processing takes time and a certificate arriving after the money has moved is of no practical use to anybody.
- The stamped Form 8288-A returned by the Internal Revenue Service is filed against your United States return, since it is the document supporting credit for whatever the buyer withheld out of the proceeds.
- The Voluntary Disclosures Program is a first-mover arrangement. Form RC199 carries the application, every affected year has to sit inside it, and a year qualifies only once it is twelve months or more past its own due date.
- Unreported United States rental income is the ordinary reason an owner comes forward, and the disclosure must reach every year that is affected rather than only the ones whose records happen to be easy to find.
- Both depreciation schedules are rebuilt as part of the submission, because a disclosure that reports the rent without establishing a cost base leaves the hardest question of all still open for a future sale.
- What acceptance buys is the penalties and part of the interest. The tax itself stays payable, and on several years of unreported rent that gap is usually the whole reason an owner decides to act.
- If a letter about those years has already reached you, that door is shut for them. We read the correspondence first, because a submission made after contact cannot be accepted and the attempt costs time.
US Rental Depreciation and Withholding Check
Six questions on whether both depreciation schedules exist, whether the land-and-building split can be shown, whether the Canadian restriction has been applied, and whether the identification number, the certificate and the sale paperwork are ready. No fee shown.
1. Do you hold a United States depreciation schedule running back to the year the property was placed in service?
2. Do you hold a separate Canadian capital cost allowance schedule for the same building?
3. Was the purchase price split between land and building on a basis you could show a reviewer?
4. Has the Canadian restriction on a capital cost allowance claim been applied across all your rental properties?
5. Do you have an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, and has a Form W-8ECI reached your tenant or manager?
6. If the property sold this year, could you produce the figures a withholding certificate application needs?
Free CPA Consultation for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Case Studies: US Rental Property Accounting & Tax
Leamington — Eleven Years of Depreciation the Canadian Return Had Never Seen
The problem: A Leamington couple had held a Fort Myers condominium for eleven years, let through a local manager. A United States preparer had filed every year and taken the depreciation. A Canadian preparer had filed every year and claimed no capital cost allowance, because the combined rental position was a loss in most of them. Neither had ever seen the other’s file. Then a buyer appeared.
What we did: We rebuilt both schedules from the original closing statement, confirmed the land-and-building split, established the United States adjusted basis and the Canadian capital cost as two separate figures, and set out in writing what each return would show on the sale and exactly why the two gains differed.
The result:
- Both cost histories reconstructed back to the purchase year
- The difference between the two gains explained in writing before closing
- Withholding certificate application started well ahead of the sale
Kingsville — A Manager Who Had Been Withholding on the Gross Rent
The problem: An owner in Kingsville received monthly payouts from an Arizona management company that were consistently short by an amount nobody at the firm could account for. No Form W-8ECI had ever been provided to the manager, the owner held no Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, and three years of United States filings had never been made at all.
What we did: We applied for the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, prepared the Form W-8ECI for the manager to hold, made the three outstanding United States filings, and rebuilt the Canadian returns for those same years from the underlying ledger instead of from the net payout totals the owner had been reporting.
The result:
- Identification number obtained and the certificate placed with the manager
- Three United States years filed and the Canadian years restated from source records
- Payouts reconciled to gross rent rather than to net deposits
Amherstburg — A Second Unit That Changed the First One’s Claim
The problem: An Amherstburg owner with a tenanted house in Texas bought a second unit in South Carolina and expected to claim capital cost allowance on both. Once the second property’s first-year costs were in, the combined rental position was a loss, and the claim the previous bookkeeper had prepared was part of what created it.
What we did: We applied subsection 1100(11) of the Income Tax Regulations across both properties together, as the Regulations require, restated the year with no capital cost allowance claimed, and set out what claiming it in a later profitable year would and would not achieve for the owner.
The result:
- The restriction applied across both properties rather than one
- The year restated before a review rather than after one
- Later claims modelled against the combined rental position
How We Work With Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
Our clear, efficient process ensures every step is transparent, building trust and long-term client relationships.
Kickoff (Document Request)
What we ask for first: the closing statement from the purchase, every United States filing made to date with its depreciation schedule, the Canadian returns for the same years, the mortgage statements, the property management or platform statements, and the identity documents an identification number application needs.
First 30 Days (Both Cost Bases Built)
The land-and-building allocation confirmed from the closing statement, the United States depreciation schedule reconstructed to the year the property was placed in service, the Canadian capital cost allowance schedule built beside it, and the distance between the two stated in writing.
The Annual Cycle
Rent and costs posted in United States dollars and converted on a stated basis, the United States filing prepared, the capital cost allowance decision taken against the combined rental position rather than this property alone, and the Canadian return filed from the same ledger.
Review Points
Form W-8ECI refreshed with the tenant or manager where the circumstances behind it have changed, the state filing position retested where the letting pattern has altered, and both schedules reconciled to each other before the year is closed off.
Disposition
The Form 8288-B withholding certificate application prepared well before closing, the buyer’s Form 8288 and Form 8288-A tracked through to the stamped copy, and each country’s gain computed from its own schedule.
Get Your US Rental Property Taxes Done Right Today
Affordable Pricing for Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties
We believe in clear, upfront pricing so you know exactly what to expect. All fees include HST.
- Tax Preparation (Corporation) — From $400
- Tax Return Filing (Corporation) — From $400
- Tax Compliance Audit — FREE CRA audit support for our clients
- Tax Strategy — FREE for our clients
- Accounting Base Plan — From $100 per month
- Bookkeeping Management — Free for our Accounting clients
- Financial Reporting — Free for our Accounting clients
- Business Formation — Flat $35
- Incorporation Process — Flat $35
- Entity Setup Assistance — Flat $35
- Full-Service Payroll — From $125 per month
Payment is by Interac e-Transfer to info@gondaliyacpa.ca only. Security question: Not Applicable, as auto-deposit is enabled.
Meet Your Lead US Rental Property Accountant
Two people hold your file, the same two every year, which is the only way two cost bases stay reconcilable over a holding period measured in decades.
What Our Clients Say
More than 1300 verified five-star Google reviews, several of them from owners who arrived with a United States depreciation schedule their Canadian return had never been shown.
Serving Canadian Owners of US Rental Properties Across Ontario
The owner is in Ontario and the building is in another country, which is the one thing every file here has in common. Two questions then settle whether a year closes quietly: can both cost bases be produced on request, and is the United States paperwork in the hands of the people who need to hold it. Owners reach us from Toronto and North York, from Scarborough, Etobicoke and Brampton, from Markham and Oakville, and from Oshawa, Ottawa, Hamilton, Guelph, Kitchener, Cambridge, London and Windsor. The two schedules are the same piece of work wherever the owner lives and whichever state the building sits in.
Toronto (ON)
55 Queen St E Ste 1205, Toronto, ON M5C 1R6, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Mississauga (ON)
2100 Camilla Rd #716, Mississauga, ON L5A 2J8
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Brampton (ON)
4 Starhill Crescent, Brampton, ON L6R 2P9, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Scarborough (ON)
24 Clementine Square, Scarborough, ON M1G 2V7, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Vaughan (ON)
19 Cabinet Crescent, Woodbridge, ON L4L 6H9, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Oshawa (ON)
210 Durham St, Oshawa, ON L1J 5R3, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Ottawa (ON)
2090 Neepawa Ave a314, Ottawa, ON K2A 3L6, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Etobicoke (ON)
60 Stevenson Rd #1601, Etobicoke, ON M9V 2B4, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Hamilton (ON)
70 Starling Dr, Hamilton, ON L9A 0C5, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Guelph (ON)
1155 Gordon St, Guelph, ON N1L 1S8, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
Windsor (ON)
4387 Guppy Ct, Windsor, ON N9G 2N8, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
North York (ON)
150 Graydon Hall Dr #912, North York, ON M3A 3B2, Canada
+1 (647) 212-9559
9:00 AM – 8:30 PM (Mon – Sun)
US Rental Property Accounting & Tax FAQs
Related Industries We Serve
Accountant for Canadian Snowbird Landlords
- A home let for one season
- Part-year cost apportionment
- Personal return and records
Accountant for Rental Property Owners
- Canadian rental income and CCA
- Current cost or capital outlay
- Statements for a lender
Accountant for Airbnb Hosts
- Short-term letting income
- Platform statements reconciled
- Registration thresholds tested
Accountant for Digital Nomads
- Residence and worldwide income
- Foreign income on a Canadian return
- Bookkeeping across currencies
US Rental Property Accounting & Tax Done Right.
Two cost histories on one building, built from the closing statement and carried forward every year instead of reconstructed in the month a buyer appears. A United States schedule under MACRS on the straight-line method, 27.5 years being the general depreciation system recovery period for residential rental property, with the mid-month convention already inside the IRS Publication 527 percentage tables. A Canadian capital cost allowance schedule on Class 1 at up to 4% declining balance, claimed only where subsection 1100(11) of the Income Tax Regulations allows it across your rental properties taken together. The land-and-building allocation documented once and used by both countries. The Individual Taxpayer Identification Number applied for early, Form W-8ECI placed with the tenant or manager so your payouts stop arriving short, and the Form 8288-B withholding certificate run well before a closing, because 15% of the amount realized is withheld from the gross price and not from the gain. The buyer’s Form 8288 and the stamped Form 8288-A tracked to the credit they support. US depreciation reduces basis and therefore increases the gain on sale, and the recapture treatment is computed on your file rather than quoted from a page. Section 230 records held six years, with the schedules kept longer. AFFORDABLE flat fees, no hourly billing. Licensed CPA Ontario. 1450+ five-star reviews. 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee.